In several European countries, governments are looking to short-term compensation schemes as a way of mitigating the potential economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. But do these schemes work in the longer term?

According to the evidence, in Germany, Japan, and Italy, more than 4% of the labor force were on a short-time work compensation scheme in 2009, in the trough of the recession.

Government schemes that compensate workers for the loss of income while they are on short hours make it easier for employers to temporarily reduce hours worked so that labor is better matched to output requirements.

When such schemes are offered, there is a strong take-up. But do the schemes have a positive economic effect? Do they help to reduce unemployment levels? Or do the distortions they cause in the labor market have a negative effect that outweighs their advantages?

Because the employers do not lay off these staff, the schemes help to maintain permanent employment levels during recessions. However, they can create inefficiency in the labor market, and might limit labor market access for freelancers and those looking to work part-time.

Germany, Japan, and Italy are examples of countries that have been affected by a strong decline in output while unemployment has increased only moderately, if at all. They have also used short-time work compensation schemes during the Great Recession of 2008–2009.

This suggests that these schemes might have a positive effect, and these apparent successes have led to a renewal of interest in them. But to discover whether the apparent success is real, it is necessary to look at earlier research into the consequences of introducing this type of scheme.

Read Pierre Cahuc’s article Short-time work compensation schemes and employment.

...................................................................................................................................................

Read further articles relating to employment:
 

• Why does part-time employment increase in recessions? (Deutsch) (Español) by Daniel Borowczyk-Martins

• Do in-work benefits work for low-skilled workers? (Deutsch) by Bruno Van der Linden

• Are part-time workers less productive and underpaid? (Deutsch) (Español) by
  Andrea Garnero

• Temporary agency work (Deutsch) by Susan N. Houseman

• Measuring employment and unemployment (Deutsch) (Español) by Andrea Brandolini and Eliana Viviano

Read some of our recent commentaries:
 

• Pandemics and the labor market - Then and now by Karen Clay

• Fighting a coronavirus recession by Daniel S. Hamermesh

• Can financial education help workers save for retirement? by Pierre-Carl Michaud

• Coronavirus and the labor market by Daniel S. Hamermesh

• Is putting children in childcare good for them? by Nabanita Datta Gupta

• Is firms’ productivity affected by accession to the EU? by Jens Hölscher and Peter Howard-Jones

• Is a highly educated workforce good for less educated workers? by John V. Winters

...................................................................................................................................................

IZA World of Labor author Pierre Cahuc discusses who benefits the most from short-time work compensation and under what circumstances it should be used.

Watch the video:

...................................................................................................................................................

Did you know IZA World of Labor has a new
LinkedIn page?

Join our community.

...................................................................................................................................................

Top stories

News and views in labor economics