Ethnic enclaves and immigrant economic integration Updated

High-quality enclave networks encourage labor market success for newly arriving immigrants

DJI, Germany, FBK-IRVAPP, Italy, and IZA, Germany

IIM Calcutta, India, and IZA, Germany

one-pager full article

Elevator pitch

Immigrants tend to live in clusters within host countries. Does clustering in ethnic enclaves explain the persistent differences in skill, employment rates, and earnings between immigrants and the native population? Empirical studies consistently find that residing in an enclave can increase earnings. While it is ambiguous whether employment probabilities are also affected or whether earnings benefits accrue to all immigrants, irrespective of their skill levels, it is clear that effects are driven by enclave “quality” (in terms of income, education, and employment) rather than enclave size.

Employment rates of immigrants (aged
                        15–64) relative to native population, 2019

Key findings

Pros

Studies based on refugee dispersal policies indicate that living in enclaves is associated with higher earnings.

Higher earnings are driven principally by enclave quality (rather than enclave size): immigrants benefit financially from high-quality enclaves, as well as in terms of employment opportunities.

Enclave quality also benefits educational achievement of second-generation immigrants.

There is some evidence that low-skilled immigrants may benefit most from living in enclaves.

Cons

There is no conclusive evidence that the size of an enclave increases employment rates.

Enclaves may reduce the employment chances of highly-skilled immigrants.

Immigrants’ labor market success can be reduced if the ethnic networks in enclaves are of low quality.

Evidence is mixed on the length of time it takes for enclave quality to impact immigrant earnings.

Reliable evidence is mainly based on policy experiments concerning asylum-seekers, while evidence on economic migrants is rare.

Author's main message

Theoretically, it is far from clear whether ethnic clustering—or enclaves—limits the prospects of labor market integration of immigrants, or instead helps integrate immigrants more successfully into a new country, due to better access to information and jobs. Empirical evidence, however, suggests that earnings may be higher for immigrants settling in ethnic enclaves, depending mainly on the quality of the co-ethnic network in an enclave. Thus, policies that encourage immigrants to settle in regions with relatively high employment rates and education levels among co-nationals may benefit their integration into the wider host-country labor market.

Full citation

Full citation

Data source(s)

Data type(s)

Method(s)

Countries