Print
References for Replication in labor economics
-
Further reading
- Christensen, G. S., Miguel, E. Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research. NBER Working Paper No.22989, 2016-12.
- National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Statistical Challenges in Assessing and Fostering the Reproducibility of Scientific Results: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016.
-
Key references
-
Berry, J., Coffman, L. C., Hanley, D., Gihleb, R., Wilson, A. J. "Assessing the rate
of replication in economics." American Economic
Review 107:5 (2017): 27−31. Key reference: [1]
-
Hamermesh, D. S. "Replication in
labor economics: Evidence from data, and what it
suggests." American Economic
Review 107:5 (2017): 37−40. Key reference: [2]
-
Chang, A. C., Li, P. Is Economics
Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers From Thirteen
Journals Say “Usually Not.” Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economics Discussion
Series No.2015–083, 2015-09. Key reference: [3]
-
Duvendack, M., Palmer-Jones, R. W., Reed, W. R. "Replications in
economics: A progress report." Econ Journal Watch 12:2 (2015): 164−191. Key reference: [4]
-
Donohue III, J. J., Levitt, S. D. "The impact of
legalized abortion on crime." The Quarterly
Journal of Economics 116:2 (2001): 379−420. Key reference: [5]
-
Foote, C. L., Goetz, C. F. "The impact of
legalized abortion on crime: Comment." The Quarterly
Journal of Economics 123:1 (2008): 407−423. Key reference: [6]
-
Kahane, L. H., Paton, D., Simmons, R. "The abortion–crime
link: Evidence from England and Wales." Economica 75:297 (2008): 1−21. Key reference: [7]
-
Card, D., Krueger, A. B. "Minimum wages and
employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey
and Pennsylvania." The American
Economic Review 84:4 (1994): 772−793. Key reference: [8]
-
Neumark, D., Wascher, W. "Minimum wages and
employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey
and Pennsylvania: Comment." The American
Economic Review 90:5 (2000): 1362−1396. Key reference: [9]
-
Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. "Are Emily and Greg
more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on
labor market discrimination" The American
Economic Review 94:4 (2004): 991−1013. Key reference: [10]
-
Jacquemet, N., Yannelis, C. "Indiscriminate
discrimination: A correspondence test for ethnic homophily in
the Chicago labor market." Labour
Economics 19:6 (2012): 824−832. Key reference: [11]
-
Deming, D. J., Yuchtman, N., Abulafi, A., Goldin, C., Katz, L. F. "The value of
postsecondary credentials in the labor market: An experimental
study." The American
Economic Review 106:3 (2016): 778−806. Key reference: [12]
-
Simonsohn, U. "How to study
discrimination (or anything) with names; if you must." Data Colada website, Blog post (2015-04-23). Key reference: [13]
-
Berry, J., Coffman, L. C., Hanley, D., Gihleb, R., Wilson, A. J. "Assessing the rate
of replication in economics." American Economic
Review 107:5 (2017): 27−31.
-
Additional References
- Baker, M. "1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility." Nature 533:7604 (2016): 452–454.
- Hubbard, R. Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science. Los Angeles: Sage, 2016.
- New Economic Papers , Accessed August 10, 2017.
- Open Science Collaboration "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science." Science 349:6251 (2015).
- Replication Wiki , Accessed August 10, 2017.
- The Replication Network , Accessed August 10, 2017.