print
References for Alternative dispute resolution
-
Further reading
- Bales, R. A. Compulsory Arbitration: The Grand Experiment in Employment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.
- Charness, G., Kuhn, P. "Lab labor: What can economists learn from the lab?" In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds). The Handbook of Labor Economics 4:A. The Netherlands: North Holland, 2011.
- Fisher, R., Ury, W. L. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books: New York, 1991.
-
Key references
-
Stevens, C. M. "Is compulsory
arbitration compatible with bargaining?" Industrial
Relations 5:2 (1966): 38–52. Key reference: [1]
-
Hebdon, R. "Fact-finding
effectiveness: Evidence from New York state" Industrial
Relations 40:1 (2001): 73–82. Key reference: [2]
-
Tijmes, J. "Who wants
what?–Final offer arbitration in the World Trade
Organization" European Journal of
International Law 26:3 (2015): 587–606. Key reference: [3]
-
Farber, H. S. "An analysis of
final-offer arbitration" The Journal of
Conflict Resolution 24:4 (1980): 683–705. Key reference: [4]
-
Feigenbaum, C. "Final offer
arbitration: Better theory than practice" Industrial
Relations 14:3 (1975): 311–317. Key reference: [5]
-
Dickinson, D. L. "The effects of
beliefs versus risk attitude on bargaining outcomes" Theory and
Decision 66 (2009): 69–101. Key reference: [6]
-
Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G. "Explaining
bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases" Journal of Economic
Perspectives 11:1 (1997): 109–126. Key reference: [7]
-
Dickinson, D. L. "The chilling effect
of optimism: The case of final-offer arbitration" Journal of
Socio-Economics 35:1 (2006): 17–30. Key reference: [8]
-
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E. "Reinterpreting
arbitration's narcotic effect: An experimental study of learning
in repeated bargaining" Games and Economic
Behavior 25:1 (1998): 1–33. Key reference: [9]
-
Falk, A., Heckman, J. "Lab experiments are
a major source of knowledge in the social sciences" Science 326:5952 (2009): 535–538. Key reference: [10]
-
Dickinson, D. L., McEvoy, D. M., Bruner, D. M. "The impact of sleep
restriction on interpersonal conflict resolution and the
narcotic effect" Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization 194 (2022): 71–90. Key reference: [11]
-
Dickinson, D. L., Hunnicutt, L. "Nonbinding
recommendations: The relative effects of focal points versus
uncertainty on bargaining outcomes" Theory and
Decision 69 (2010): 615–634. Key reference: [12]
-
Stevens, C. M. "Is compulsory
arbitration compatible with bargaining?" Industrial
Relations 5:2 (1966): 38–52.
-
Additional References
- Ashenfelter, O., Currie, J., Farber, H. S., Spiegel, M. "An experimental comparison of dispute rates in alternative arbitration systems" Econometrica 60:6 (1992): 1407–1433.
- Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharof, S. "Creating convergence: Debiasing biased litigants" Law and Social Inquiry 22:4 (1997): 913–925.
- Bénabou, R., Tirole, J. "Over my dead body: Bargaining and the price of dignity" American Economic Review 99:2 (2009): 459–465.
- Brams, S. J., Merrill, S. "Binding versus final-offer arbitration: A combination is best" Management Science 32:10 (1986): 1346–1355.
- Brams, S. J., Merrill, S. "Equilibrium strategies for final-offer arbitration: There is no median convergence" Management Science 29:8 (1983): 927–941.
- Butler, R. J., Ehrenberg, R. G. "Estimating the narcotic effect of public sector impasse procedures" Industrial and Labor Relations Review 35:1 (1981): 3–20.
- Crawford, V. P. "On compulsory-arbitration schemes" Journal of Political Economy 87:1 (1979): 131–159.
- Currie, J., McConnell, S. "Collective bargaining in the public sector: The effect of legal structure on dispute costs and wages" American Economic Review 81:4 (1991): 693–718.
- Deck, C. A., Farmer, A. "Bargaining over an uncertain value: Arbitration mechanisms compared" Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 23:3 (2007): 547–579.
- Deck, C. A., Farmer, A., Zeng, D. "Amended final-offer arbitration outperforms final-offer arbitration" American Law and Economics Review 9:2 (2007): 384–407.
- Deck, C. A., Farmer, A., Zeng, D. "Amended final-offer arbitration over an uncertain value: A comparison with CA and FOA" Experimental Economics 10:4 (2007): 439–454.
- Dickinson, D. L., Hunnicutt, L. "Does fact-finding promote settlement? Theory and a test" Economic Inquiry 43:2 (2005): 401–416.
- Dickinson, D. L. "A comparison of conventional, final-offer, and ‘combined’ arbitration for dispute Resolution" Industrial and Labor Relations Review 57:2 (2004): 288–301.
- Dickinson, D. L. "Bargaining outcomes with double-offer arbitration" Experimental Economics 8 (2005): 145–166.
- Farber, H. S., Katz, H. C. "Interest arbitration, outcomes, and the incentive to bargain" Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33:1 (1979): 55–63.
- Farber, H. S., Bazerman, M. H. "Divergent expectations as a cause of disagreement in bargaining: Evidence from a comparison of arbitration schemes" Quarterly Journal of Economics 104:1 (1989): 99–120.
- McLeod, S. A. "Experimental methods in psychology" Simply Psychology (2012).
- Wirtz, W. "Address before National Academy of Arbitrators" Daily Labor Report 23 (1963): F1−F4.
- Zeng, D. "An amendment to final-offer arbitration" Mathematical Social Sciences 46:1 (2003): 9–19.
- Zeng, D., Nakamura, S., Ibaraki, T. "Double-offer arbitration" Mathematical Social Sciences 31:3 (1996): 147–170.